top of page
  • Writer: Don Lichterman
    Don Lichterman
  • Jul 3, 2019
  • 3 min read

ree

A surging inmate population in the 1980s led to a boom in for-profit prisons. Today, privately run prisons have become the government’s default detention centers for undocumented migrants.


The Trump administration's immigration policies have drawn condemnation, but increasingly the criticism has also turned to a web of companies that are part of the multibillion-dollar industry that runs detention facilities housing tens of thousands of migrants around the country.


Businesses that supply goods and services to support those detention centers face increasing public and political scrutiny from investors, employees and activists.

Last week, employees at Wayfair protested after one worker discovered the Boston-based company was supplying bedroom furniture to a facility housing migrant children seeking asylum.


And Bank of America said it would stop financing private prison and immigration detention companies, following similar declarations by JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo. Such lending is vital to the construction and expansion of detention facilities, though the industry still has plenty of other options; SunTrust, Barclays, BNP Paribas and other smaller regional banks have not cut ties with the industry.

Florida Dems Return $10K Private-Prison Donation After New Times Story


In 2018, the Florida Democratic Party said it would stop taking donations from private, for-profit prison firms. So, after New Times first reported last month that the party had accepted a $10,000 check from inmate-transport company G4S Secure Solutions — a company that also runs private prisons in other countries — activists cried foul. Now, the party says it will return the money.


"The Florida Democratic Party did not solicit the donation from G4S, but we did receive a donation from them and are returning it," spokesman Alex Morash told the Florida Phoenix in an emailed statement.

ree
"Corporations Are People Too My Friends."
Our companies are known for creating products that enhance people's lives.  Through Sunset Corporation of America and its companies, we’re equally dedicated to improving lives.  Our commitment extends to helping local communities, fostering better educational systems, supporting the arts and culture, helping disadvantaged youth, protecting and improving the environment, animal welfare, wildlife issues and encouraging employee volunteerism.

The Sustainable Action Network (SAN), A Don Lichterman non-profit organization dedicated to building a global community raising awareness of corruption, injustice and the need for action across a full range of issues impacting people and animal/wildlife welfare around the world, such as conservation, climate change, campaign law, lobbying, government action and rescue work. SAN’s vision is to create safer world, free from political, environmental, and social oppression, where all the inhabitants of Earth can live in harmony within their own natural environments.

Our companies are known for creating products that enhance people's lives.  Through Sunset Corporation of America and its companies, we’re equally dedicated to improving lives.   Our commitment extends to helping local communities, fostering better educational systems, supporting the arts and culture, helping disadvantaged youth, protecting and improving the environment, animal welfare, wildlife issues and encouraging employee volunteerism.


Activism and Sustainability:

  • Gun Safety & Gun Laws

  • Cruelty Free

  • Death Penalty

  • Demand Action

  • Sustainable Action Network

Fairness and Equality:

  • Grammy District Advocacy

  • Privatization

  • Voters Issues & Gerrymandering

  • Private Prisons & the War on Drugs

  • Finance, Housing & the Economy Corporate Responsibility:

  • Candidates, Bills, Laws & Protections

  • Wildlife & Oceania

  • Labeling & Transparency

  • Comprehensive Captivity & Hunting Results Databases


ree

ree

Conservatives Concerned About the Death Penalty - A Project of Equal Justice USA

ree

Conservatives Concerned About the Death Penalty - A Project of Equal Justice USA


The last year has been one for the history books in the movement to end the death penalty. Since last fall, we have seen three states end the use of capital punishment – one through legislative repeal of the law, one through executive action stopping all executions, and one through a judicial decision ruling the death penalty unconstitutional. If this were horse racing, we essentially just won the Triple Crown.


In New Hampshire, the legislature passed a bill to repeal the death penalty for the second time in as many years. While their governor vetoed the bill both times, this year a bipartisan coalition banded together to override his veto, making the Granite State the 21st to completely rid itself of capital punishment. The state will now save millions a year that it can redirect toward solving cold-cases and on programs that could actually prevent violence in the first place.


In California, Governor Newsom used his executive power to put a halt to executions and shutter the state’s execution chamber. After wasting over $4 billion to carry out 13 executions since reinstatement, this action couldn’t have come soon enough.


And in Washington, the state’s Supreme Court found overwhelming evidence that their system was wrought with socioeconomic and racial bias and arbitrariness, leading them to throw out the death penalty law as counter to the State’s constitution and to convert all death sentences.


These are huge victories, but they aren’t the only signs of success. This year, 10 states have seen Republican-sponsored legislation introduced to repeal the death penalty. Louisiana passed a bill out of committee; Ohio’s house passed a bill to prevent those with severe mental illness from being executed; Wyoming fell only four votes shy of passing repeal, and Ohio’s governor halted executions as he continues to study the constitutionality of lethal injection drugs. Click here to learn more!


Death Penalty Focus (DPF) President Mike Farrell explains why we can’t sit back in the wake of California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s moratorium.


New Hampshire repeals its death penalty, the 21st state in the union and last state in New England, to do so.


DPF is building on the momentum of the moratorium and the victory in New Hampshire with new leadership and a new location.


The South shows no sign in slowing down its pace of executions, with four states killing five men in the past few weeks.Florida’s first African-American state attorney announces she won’t run for re-election, a disappointing decision for abolitionists everywhere.A new study finds that the death penalty means higher taxes, fewer services.


You’ll find all that, plus a quick rundown of death penalty developments around the country, and a few reading suggestions below.

DPF President Mike Farrell takes note of the increasingly ugly rhetoric coming from a group of death penalty supporters, and says we can’t be complacent in the wake of Gov. Gavin Newsom’s moratorium. “The struggle is ours to win, but it’s not over,” he says. Read More


New Hampshire repeals its death penalty Twenty-one years after New Hampshire legislator Renny Cushing introduced his first bill to repeal the death penalty, he was finally successful last month when the legislature overrode Gov. Chris Sununu’s veto, and abandoned capital punishment. Twenty one states have now outlawed the barbaric punishment, and four others have moratoria in place. In addition, the repeal means no state in New England has the death penalty.


“Our efforts do pay off even if, as in New Hampshire, it takes decades,” DPF President Mike Farrell says.


For Rep. Cushing, it was a personal as well as a political victory. Both Cushing’s father and brother-in-law were murdered in separate incidents, and Cushing has long decried the cycle of violence that the death penalty perpetuates.


“I know firsthand that the pain and trauma from losing a loved one to violent crime will never dissipate. Today’s vote will ensure that this cycle of pain, which only creates more and more victims in its wake, will no longer be perpetuated by our state government,” Cushing said in astatement released after the vote.


The override wouldn’t have been possible, of course, without the votes of Republican legislators. In her Atlantic article, “GOP Lawmakers Are Quietly Turning Against the Death Penalty,” Madeleine Carlisle points out that, “New Hampshire is one of a growing number of states where Republicans . . . are joining Democrats to push for a ban.”


She says there are several reasons conservatives are increasingly opposed to the death penalty, but believes the basic reason is exemplified by two of the New Hampshire Republicans who voted for repeal. Rep. David Welch, whose wife died on Christmas Day 2016, and Sen. Bob Guida, whose wife lives in a vegetative state, both cited their personal experiences as motivating factors in their becoming death penalty opponents. “That type of deeply intimate answer may be why Republicans and Democrats in New Hampshire, and in other states, are joining together to scrap death-penalty laws, even as they remain deeply polarized on a whole set of other issues,” Carlisle writes.


New Hampshire has not executed anyone since 1939. The only person on death row is David Addison, who was convicted of killing Manchester police officer Michael Briggs in 2006. The repeal does not apply retroactively.


Four states, five executions. The machinery of death was in high gear in the South in May. Georgia, Tennessee, and Florida each killed a man, and Alabama executed two.


Georgia began the month by executing Scotty Garnell Morrow on May 2 for the 1994 murder of his ex-girlfriend, Barbara Ann Young, and her friend, Tonya Woods. He was also convicted of shooting a third woman, LaToya Horne, who survived. Morrow, who apologized to the friends and family members of the victims in his last statement, had his spiritual advisor, an imam, with him in the death chamber. His was Georgia’s first execution this year.


Alabama executed two prisoners, both of whom were teenagers at the time of their alleged crimes. And both had suffered severe physical and sexual abuse as children.


Michael Samra was 19 when he confessed to helping Mark Duke kill his father, Randy Duke, Duke’s fiancee Dedra Mims Hunt, and her two young daughters, Chelsea Marie and Chelisa Nicole Hunt, in 1997. Both Samra and Duke, who was 16 at the time of the murders, were sentenced to death, but Duke’s death sentence was commuted in 2005, after the Supreme Court found in Roper v. Simmons that it was unconstitutional to execute a defendant who was younger than 18 at the time of the crime. According to AL.com, Samra’s lawyers had argued in a petition to the U.S. Supreme Court that “evolving standards of decency” called for a ban on the execution of defendants who were under the age of 21 at the time of their crimes, but the Court declined to review his case.


Christopher Lee Price was also 19 when he was charged in the 1991 murder of pastor Bill Lynn in the course of a home robbery. He was sentenced to death by a vote of 10-2 in 1993.


According to CBS News, his execution was delayed while state officials waited for a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court on a request for a stay Price’s lawyers had filed. They argued that Price had a federal lawsuit pending challenging the state’s lethal injection protocol which was scheduled to be heard this month but, over the objections of Justice Stephen Breyer, the court voted 5-4 to allow the execution to proceed.


Price’s last words were “A man is much more than his worst mistake,” according to CBS News.

Florida executed 65-year-old Bobby Joe Long for the murder of Michelle Denise Simms in 1984. Long had confessed to killing 10 women and raping dozens of others over an eight-month period in 1984, but ultimately pleaded guilty to killing eight women, and in 1985, was sentenced to death for Simms’ murder.


Finally, Tennessee executed Don Johnson for the murder of his wife, Connie, in 1984. Johnson was a very different man from the one who walked onto death row all those years ago. He became a Seventh Day Adventist, and was ordained by that church as a deacon because of the ministry work he had done with other condemned prisoners. Church officials and members, as well as Johnson’s stepdaughter, had asked the state to spare his life.

Nevertheless, Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee who, according to the Times Free Press, was elected last year after a “campaign that centered on his religious faith,” refused to grant clemency to Johnson in spite of his conversion and his good works in prison.


The day before he was killed, Johnson released a letter in which he wrote, “I truly regret my life and what I became in the process. I will continue to carry the pain of all the grief that I have caused others to endure.”


Johnson’s execution is the first of four Tennessee is planning for this year. Last year, after a nine-year hiatus, the state killed three prisoners.


Florida SA Aramis Ayala won’t run for reelection. Stating that, “After the Florida Supreme Court’s decision on the death penalty, it became abundantly clear to me that the death penalty law in the state of Florida is in direct conflict with my view and my vision for the administration of justice,” Aramis Ayala announced that she will not seek re-election as Orange-Osceola State Attorney.


Ayala made the announcement in a video  posted on her Facebook page.


Soon after she was elected in 2016, Ayala declared that she would no longer seek the death penalty in murder cases prosecuted in her district. In response, then-Gov. Rick Scott re-assigned approximately 24 of her office’s homicide cases to a prosecutor in another district. Ayala challenged the decision, and in 2017, the Florida Supreme Court, in a 5-2 decision, ruled in favor of Scott. (The majority opinion was written by a judge who had been appointed to the Supreme Court months earlier by Scott.)


After the ruling, Ayala convened a Death Penalty Review Panel of seven assistant state attorneys to assess first degree murder cases in her district and recommend charges.

In her Facebook statement Ayala, the first African-American state attorney in Florida history, said that her efforts to diversify the SA’s office “to better reflect the rich diversity of the community in which we live,” meant she was able to “raise the standard of prosecutorial accountability.”


Ayala will remain in office until her term is up in 2020.


Study: The death penalty means higher taxes; fewer services. “I have no reason to believe government officials are deliberately hiding the way they pay for capital trials, but I do believe taxpayers in death penalty states are paying for these trials in ways they would not realize.”


And some of the ways they’re paying, according to West Virginia University Economics Professor Alexander Lundberg in his recently published paper, “On the Public Finance of Capital Punishment,” is by paying higher property taxes. “Counties meet the expense of trial by raising property tax rates and by reducing public safety expenditure. Property crime rises as a consequence of the latter,” he explained in an email.


While Lundberg says that “in some cases” county officials are open about raising taxes or reallocating funds from other areas, some “may not even be aware of the trade-off. They could simply look at a budget deficit and try to handle it by raising taxes and cutting spending in the most accessible targets.”


He says what was most surprising to him was the link between capital trials and property crime.


“Although we know police deter crime, I was surprised to find counties often cut spending on police to fund these trials.” He says Katherine Baicker, dean of the University of Chicago Harris School of Public Policy and Law Professor and Founding Director of the West Virginia Innocence Project Valena Beety both have found evidence of cuts to road and bridge spending as well.


Lundberg focused on Texas — which he says is “typical of how most death penalty states operate” — because of its “data availability and financial transparency.” The state “publishes the outcomes of all capital trials and requires counties to have independent auditors provide annual financial statements.” And because it holds more death penalty trials than most other states, it “offers an exceptional opportunity to study how counties respond to the fiscal shock of capital trials.”


While Lundberg doesn’t believe governments are trying to hide how they pay for capital trials, he does think, “Support for the death penalty would decrease if citizens knew its true cost to them personally. I think most people would be surprised to learn they pay higher taxes and get fewer government services, like policing, to maintain the death penalty.”

"Corporations Are People Too My Friends."
Our companies are known for creating products that enhance people's lives.  Through Sunset Corporation of America and its companies, we’re equally dedicated to improving lives.  Our commitment extends to helping local communities, fostering better educational systems, supporting the arts and culture, helping disadvantaged youth, protecting and improving the environment, animal welfare, wildlife issues and encouraging employee volunteerism.

The Sustainable Action Network (SAN), A Don Lichterman non-profit organization dedicated to building a global community raising awareness of corruption, injustice and the need for action across a full range of issues impacting people and animal/wildlife welfare around the world, such as conservation, climate change, campaign law, lobbying, government action and rescue work. SAN’s vision is to create safer world, free from political, environmental, and social oppression, where all the inhabitants of Earth can live in harmony within their own natural environments. Our companies are known for creating products that enhance people's lives.  Through Sunset Corporation of America and its companies, we’re equally dedicated to improving lives.   Our commitment extends to helping local communities, fostering better educational systems, supporting the arts and culture, helping disadvantaged youth, protecting and improving the environment, animal welfare, wildlife issues and encouraging employee volunteerism.

Activism and Sustainability:

  • Gun Safety & Gun Laws

  • Cruelty Free

  • Death Penalty

  • Demand Action

  • Sustainable Action Network

Fairness and Equality:

  • Grammy District Advocacy

  • Privatization

  • Voters Issues & Gerrymandering

  • Private Prisons & the War on Drugs

  • Finance, Housing & the Economy

Corporate Responsibility:

  • Candidates, Bills, Laws & Protections

  • Wildlife & Oceania

  • Labeling & Transparency

  • Comprehensive Captivity & Hunting Results Databases

ree


The GOP acts like Nigel Tufnel from Spinal Tap! Donald Trump acts like Nigel too all of the time. Especially, in that interview with George Stephanopoulos.

First off, everyone needs to account for how the Donald J. Trump campaign used Russian agents, deceiving bots and out and out lies where he would literally say anything depending on where he was speaking that day. Because that is a vital reason as to why and how he won in that last general election.


But this interview is just cringe worthy and it is as if Trump knows that if he just says anything over and over, that his trance like message will get to his people. And, his people seem to still believe him. Which is still astonishing to me.


Part of his freak out is because he knows that when he uses foreign agents or corrupt ways to win an election next year, that does not get picked up in polls.


The other thing that constantly gets glossed over is the theft of the emails and documents after the Democratic Party was hacked into by the Russian Agents that helped Trump's campaign. Further, that meeting in Trump Tower and I would maintain any other meeting they had with Russian Agents, was to get the stolen documents and emails in their hands.


Also, why is everyone saying that Trump basically told the Russians to steal the emails in that one infamous speech when he said "Russia if you have those emails," because I maintain the emails were already stolen by the time he said that sentence. Unless that breach was time stamped and marked as such somewhere, I have never seen anything along those lines.


Why are we to believe that they acted like bumbling fools which is how in part they are skating by any illegal issues? Where as if you and I screwed up by not knowing some federal law, we would still be having the FBI knocking on our doors. I never knew that I could merely combat any legal claim with the 'I had no clue it was illegal' defense.


But that tactic of acting like Nigel from Spinal Tap is how they act. They will literally get a fact shown to them in front of their faces and what do they do all of the time? They merely repeat whatever line they are saying over and over like Nigel does when he says the amp goes to 11.


How about Trump basically stating that he can't win on his on merits?


By him saying that yeah, he would look at the information before handing it off to the Department of Justice which was basically a lie because initially he said he would merely take it and use it, like they did in 2016. But regardless, why would anyone need shady information about an opponent when they should be able to deal based on their own platform, merit & experience.


The GOP will do anything to win. No matter how corrupt. They are always trying to ploy something like with gerrymandering and voters suppression tactics. They literally do NOT want people to vote. And, they will say anything and do anything to win. Trump himself has lied what? Almost 11,000 or 12,000 times since the inauguration in 2017? If you are always lying, you are trying to get over on something and everyone or someone.


Speaking of which, 'Meet the Press' sucks.


Did you hear Steve Scalise somehow blame Hilary Clinton for Trump using Russian agents in that last election?


Chuck Todd did not respond and he let him spew out the lie about Hilary hiring some foreign guy to get dirt on Trump when it was some company and third party that hired Fusion GPS which led to them getting that Steele Dossier. They are now using the Christopher Steele name saying how its no different than what Trump did in the last election. Which at that time, using that Steele guy was great. He had an impeccable reputation then. But when he told the truth, Trump went off on him and the GOP followed. Now his reputation is is in the mud and he was basically run out of town so to speak.


Trump does not care about harming people in that exact way and just because they told the truth. The truth is generally not so great for Trump. Anything real is not great when it comes to him.


The campaign he is running so far is the same bag of tricks that he has had for years now.


The GOP and Trump will do the obvious by painting the Democrats that are running as socialistic and how Liz Warren wants to break up the most lucrative industry in big tech. Trump will also continue to tout how great the economy is because of him.


The so called Trump Administration's "Economic Miracle" has really been a continuation from the last administrations policies and results.


Let's examine this economic miracle we are supposedly seeing here in the United States. 


First, President Trump promised over 3% growth, however, only two (2) quarters have exceeded 3% since he has been the POTUS. Plus, I doubt there was any study or science behind it and honestly, we will stay well under 3% throughout all of 2019 with that economic growth still declining to under the 2% mark according to JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs and all of those companies that do that work. 


This steep decline is in huge part because of this last Government shutdown. 


Further, President Obama had exceeded the 3% growth mark also two (2) times while he was the POTUS. 


Trump maintains they will hit the 3% mark this year in 2019 but that is either a bold faced lie or delusion.


Second, this decline if you will, are all consequences of Trump's policies. 

Second is our Budget Deficits. Look at budget deficits when that financial bubble and crises hit back in 2008/2009. It was at an all time high then under George Bush Jr, a Republican President and Administration. 


That growth leveled out almost fully during the Obama years and to where it was at during the Bill Clinton era but then boom, it starts to rise again when Trump, another Republican that is in place as the POTUS.


Because of Trump's tax cuts and because of what he has done with regard to entitlement programs, deficits will hit a trillion dollars next year. That will keep going to eventually exceed 2 Trillion Dollars in deficits by the next decade or after the next ten years. 

Moreover, we are literally not only doing nothing about the deficit problem, we are also making it worse every time a Republican is in office. 


The GOP talking points (Mick Mulvaney on yesterday's Meet The Press for instance) are all about how the Democrats are pulling the USA back when it's them doing just that.

I would also be the bet the house that Trump has no clue about what that all means unless again, he is lying because all he does is speak about Trade Deficit. That has nothing to do with the Trillion Dollar Budget Deficit we will have by the end of this year.


So again and overall after Bill Clinton, that budget deficit exploded under George Bush Jr. while leveling out during the Obama years only to explode through the roof now again under Donald J. Trump.


Do you see that trend here?

ree

ree

Third, manufacturing had dropped a lot since 2000 and through the financial bust in 2008/2009. Manufacturing leveled off but did decline a tiny bit under Obama's administration. However since 2016 and 2017, it has been declining to an all time low.

ree

Trump and his administration has added about 500K manufacturing jobs but lost 5.5 million overall and so manufacturing is not doing much under Trump. It has declined a tad since the Obama era. 


Last, we have the Stock Market. Currently we are set at about a 19.2% increase in the two (2) years under Trump and his administration. That is not bad at all but it is not even close to what happened with regard to the stock market during the Obama years. 


There was a total increase of 19.7% under George Bush Sr. while Bill Clinton had a low increase at about 8.5% during his years. But then George Bush Jr. and Dick Cheney had an unprecedented -36.3% decrease or increase however it is supposed to be stated when doing negatives.


Then, under Obama and his administration, the markets increased 62.4%.

Which blows away Trump's 19.2%.


Trump keeps tweeting and boasting today or this year I should say about his stock market numbers and how the DOW is above 25K. When he tweeted the same exact numbers 13 months ago and so in essence it has done a thing basically in over a year. 

But he tweets about not going above what he did last year which I get because his followers are clueless. 


Lily Roberts and Andy Green from The Center for American Progress write that 'The Trump Economy brought us the longest partial federal government shutdown in American history and even though that may be over, the economic consequences for people across the country endure.'


Decades of conservative rhetoric about smaller government were tested in real time, with disastrous costs for individuals, families, and businesses. On Tuesday night, President Donald Trump will deliver a State of the Union address that is sure to pass the blame for his shutdown onto others while he takes credit for an economy that has been growing for nine years. In his two years in office, President Trump has done everything in his power to set American workers and families back and place the country on the road to a low-wage, high-cost economy in which a few hands hold all the economic power. The 35-day shutdown is just the latest in a series of actions that hurt everyone except the wealthy and those with political connections.


Trump’s shutdown cost American families


The shutdown is the latest example of the Trump administration’s disregard for American workers and families. The Congressional Budget Office calculated that the five-week shutdown cost the U.S. economy $11 billion, $3 billion of which will never be recouped. But for millions of Americans, the shutdown’s effect on their paychecks was more apparent. About 800,000 federal workers were furloughed or worked without pay, and as many as 1.2 million contractors felt the impact—and may not receive back pay. In addition, shutdowns have a disproportionate effect on black workers and families. In fact, the proportion of federal workers who are black women is twice as high in the federal government as it is in the greater civilian workforce. At the beginning of the shutdown, about half of all federal workers were still required to show up to work without pay; yet that number grew as the Trump administration played favorites with agencies in response to lobbying from some industries.


Beyond the shutdown’s effects on the nearly 2 million workers employed by the federal government or working as contractors, there are economic consequences that result from closing various parts of the government that help Americans in their everyday lives. For example, elderly renters in rural areas rely on the Department of Agriculture for rental assistance while homeless veterans rely on the Department of Housing and Urban Development for similar assistance. Moreover, as a result of the shutdown, community organizations that help families afford food or stay safe while fleeing domestic violence dealt with funding uncertainty and had to limit support or tap into emergency funds. Meanwhile, small-business owners who had planned to expand into new areas or hire new staff were unable to receive loans from the Small Business Administration. And delays in reports and forecasting about agricultural crops and fisheries have constrained farmers’ ability to prepare for the spring season. Larger businesses even suffered consequences: The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) delayed initial public offerings (IPOs), limiting businesses’ ability to raise capital as planned. Government funding will expire again next week, and it is imperative that the president does not shut the government down this time.


Trump cherry-picks data to hide struggles of everyday Americans


In his State of the Union address, President Trump will tout carefully chosen data about the economy in order to make a case for his policies. Yet the statistics that the president uses to brag about the economy do not capture the full picture. Moreover, they hide where—and which—Americans continue to struggle. The overall unemployment rate has continued to go down this year, as it has since long before the Trump administration. But low unemployment has not translated into commensurate gains in wages or sufficient improvement in labor force participation. Typically, the low unemployment rates on which the president focuses would indicate that workers are in demand, which in turn raises salaries or leads to better jobs. Instead, wages have barely budged. The minimum wage has lost significant purchasing power in the decade since it was increased. Overall, real wages for workers without four-year college degrees have been essentially stagnant for decades.


Similarly, the overall participation of 25- to 54-year-old workers in the labor market is down from its 1999 peak level, an indicator of slack in the labor market. More and more Americans aren’t participating fully in the economy—meaning they have stopped looking for jobs or are unable to find full-time work when they look for it. As the Center for American Progress’ Blueprint for the 21st Century highlights, this reflects an economy that is not creating jobs that American workers need—especially jobs for non-college-educated Americans. Indeed, if the labor force participation rate for 25- to 54-year-olds were at its 1999 peak, the unemployment rate for this demographic would increase from 3.3 percent to 5.6 percent.


Furthermore, the employment numbers show that the employment and wage gaps that exist across America have not closed; these gaps persist between urban areas and rural communities, between white and black Americans, between white and Latinx Americans, and between women and men—as well as at the intersections of these groups. At the end of 2018, the unemployment rate for Latinx workers was 1.4 times that of white workers, and the unemployment rate for black workers was nearly double that of white workers. Earnings are also constrained by a person’s demographics: Women, black and Latino men, and white men without four-year college degrees earn significantly less each week than white men overall. Meanwhile, people with disabilities and members of the LGBTQ community face

discrimination and barriers to participation in the labor market. Regional differences also remain pronounced, in some cases, reflecting years of systemic inequality—including anti-worker policies—while, in others, reflecting government failures to invest in workers and communities.

ree

Trump’s economy continues to squeeze Americans who are struggling to make ends meet. As the costs of rent, child care, health care, and post secondary education continue to rise faster than wages, declining earnings and persistent wage and wealth gaps illustrate that, for many Americans, the ability to save for retirement or send children to college is out of reach. Since 2000, rent of primary residences has increased, on average, by 15 percent in real terms, while the median income of renter households has decreased by 2 percent. This trend makes it increasingly difficult for renters to afford other basic necessities and makes saving and building wealth nearly impossible. As the American middle class continues to decline as a share of total U.S. income, working families seeking to join or stay in the middle class face greater challenges than ever.


Americans can’t build wealth without wage growth and support systems


In the State of the Union, the president will likely brag about the stock market, claiming that it shows the strength of the economy. But for millions of Americans, the 2008 financial crisis and failure to fully recover from the Great Recession were major hits to wealth reserves. As families try to rebuild their wealth—the strongest indicator of their ability to weather a health crisis or period of unemployment—they are thwarted by stagnant working- and middle-class wage growth. Moreover, due to long-term structural inequality and discrimination, the wealth gap between black and white families persists regardless of education, marital status, age, or income. Today, 4 in 10 adults would not be able to afford a $400 emergency expense. Without targeted policies that address income as a means of building wealth, American families—particularly nonwhite families—will remain economically insecure.


Stagnant wages, low-quality jobs, and rising costs have created an economy in which 51 million American households struggle to afford basic necessities. Yet the Trump administration has launched repeated attacks on programs that help families put food on the table and send their kids to the doctor. It has pushed punitive so-called work requirement policies, which take food, health care, and housing away from workers who cannot find a job or get enough hours at work each month. Last December, on the day that Congress rejected a version of the Farm Bill that would have dismantled food assistance with work requirements, the Trump administration announced plans to sidestep Congress and impose these cuts unilaterally. Similarly, the administration has encouraged states to take away health care from unemployed and underemployed workers by imposing Medicaid restrictions, compounding the damage from its efforts to sabotage health care markets. The administration has also proposed such cuts for housing assistance, despite a spiraling homelessness crisis driven by a lack of affordable housing. These moves aren’t just cruel; evidence shows that stripping basic necessities away from workers won’t help them find a job any faster—and may actually be counterproductive. Moreover, there is no indication that the president will use his major annual address to roll out any major reversals to his harmful policies.


Trump’s tax tactics benefit the wealthy


Against this backdrop, concentration of economic power only gets worse. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017 showcased the president’s true priorities: corporations, not American families. Despite the trends outlined above, the Trump administration made it a top priority to enact a tax cut heavily weighted toward large corporations and the wealthy, which the administration jammed through Congress at the end of 2017 despite strong public opposition. In his address, President Trump will likely repeat the claim that the tax cuts will soon trickle down to American workers in the form of a $4,000 wage increase for the typical family. But that promise has proven to be false. Instead, corporate profits have skyrocketed, while the gulf between these profits and wages continues to widen.

ree

Trump administration officials have claimed that the tax cuts would spur a boom in new business investment. However, no such boom has materialized. Business investment grew in the first two quarters of 2018 but slowed dramatically in the third quarter. Instead of investing in real estate, purchasing machinery or tools from local businesses, increasing wages, or making other economic decisions that contribute to the growth of communities, businesses have simply put more money toward stock buybacks. Corporations have largely chosen to use their tax windfall to enrich shareholders and executives and to drive mergers and acquisitions across the economy.


Power is kept in the hands of the few


Despite campaign promises to look out for workers, the Trump administration has furthered this concentration of economic power by largely green lighting another wave of corporate consolidation. In sector after sector, America faces the growing threat of closed markets controlled by a small handful of dominant firms, which is stifling entrepreneurship, innovation, and consumer choice, while also imperiling democracy.


Concentrated economic power is further bolstered by a wave of deregulation being driven economy wide. From workplace safety protections to the environment, corporate power increases, while working families’ priorities are crushed. Furthermore, the administration and Trump-appointed financial regulators are rolling back the important financial stability safeguards and consumer protections put in place to keep American workers from facing another financial crisis. The fact that the shutdown further hamstrung the SEC’s ability to hold companies and financial market participants accountable is only the latest example of the administration’s clear preferences: It answers to Wall Street, not working families.


In Conclusion, Trump’s low-wage, high-cost, power-concentrated economy is not the only choice America has. The vision of government and America that the president will provide in Tuesday’s address won’t present a suite of policies that could raise wages, lower costs, build wealth, or break up concentrated economic power to restore accountable government. Congress should pass a bold infrastructure package to create jobs and raise wages and to tackle the climate crisis. As CAP’s Jobs Blueprint lays out, government can improve lives and provide well-paid, dependable jobs by investing in child care, school construction, climate-focused retrofits, and long-term care, as well as by providing a partial job guarantee for communities facing the most severe challenges. Pairing these jobs with paid training; a $15 minimum wage; comprehensive and equitable paid family and medical leave; and tools to increase worker voice and power can meaningfully improve economic opportunities for workers and families across America.


The POTUS will not introduce policies to increase wages; nor will it announce any intentions to rein in costs. Government, however, can address the cost burden facing working families by investing in bold new approaches to build affordable housing, taking further steps to ensure that all Americans have affordable health care, fighting for workers’ retirement savings, and standing with savers and retirees—rather than with Wall Street.


Economic power and political power reinforce and strengthen each other, and Trump’s vision of the economy concentrates these powers in the hands of the few. Government can and must stand for a democracy where economic and political power are broadly distributed. That means implementing key democracy reforms; reviving antitrust enforcement for industries from agriculture to technology; and ensuring that financial markets are oriented toward the long-term public interest. The state of the economy will only be strong when government is equipped and empowered to stand up for all Americans. 


As far as them always acting like Nigel from Spinal Tap. Trump tried that Jedi mind trick in the ABC interview where he says whatever he wants to push over three times in one sentence.


Mike Pompeo did it this week with Chris Wallace. That was another awful reply to the same question which he said to disregard anything said to date, and to believe him (in so many words).


Same goes with the GOP head, Kevin McCarthy. He did it last week in that press conference. That was another awful response defending what Trump said initially.


For the first time though, I am realizing how bad of a one trick pony so to speak, Trump is in his Tweets and Speeches. I always knew that he had nothing to say but him and the GOP blaming Obama and Hillary for everything has to be getting old even to his base.


For instance, if a 5 year old kid kept blaming everyone and everything else for his woes, what would a parent do?

ree

Anyway and overall, do you guys know Bishop Garrison?


He is undoubtedly the best public speaker on TV today. Every time I have seen him on the Weekend shows, he is on it. Honestly, thank god for him because the other person on the panel is set up there to basically lie. And, he rebuts it perfectly. Better than perfect because he not only knows what he is talking about in every sentence and word, he also has no problem talking iover the person trying to interrupt him. I have seen him do that a few times now. There is no doubt that you will be hearing so much about that guy. He is something else.



He is the person the Democrats need going on the Fox News' of the world. Let alone he needs to be on any panel where there are points and counter points.

"Corporations Are People Too My Friends."
Our companies are known for creating products that enhance people's lives.  Through Sunset Corporation of America and its companies, we’re equally dedicated to improving lives.  Our commitment extends to helping local communities, fostering better educational systems, supporting the arts and culture, helping disadvantaged youth, protecting and improving the environment, animal welfare, wildlife issues and encouraging employee volunteerism.

The Sustainable Action Network (SAN), A Don Lichterman non-profit organization dedicated to building a global community raising awareness of corruption, injustice and the need for action across a full range of issues impacting people and animal/wildlife welfare around the world, such as conservation, climate change, campaign law, lobbying, government action and rescue work. SAN’s vision is to create safer world, free from political, environmental, and social oppression, where all the inhabitants of Earth can live in harmony within their own natural environments.

Our companies are known for creating products that enhance people's lives.  Through Sunset Corporation of America and its companies, we’re equally dedicated to improving lives.   Our commitment extends to helping local communities, fostering better educational systems, supporting the arts and culture, helping disadvantaged youth, protecting and improving the environment, animal welfare, wildlife issues and encouraging employee volunteerism.


Activism and Sustainability:

  • Gun Safety & Gun Laws

  • Cruelty Free

  • Death Penalty

  • Demand Action

  • Sustainable Action Network

Fairness and Equality:

  • Grammy District Advocacy

  • Privatization

  • Voters Issues & Gerrymandering

  • Private Prisons & the War on Drugs

  • Finance, Housing & the Economy Corporate Responsibility:

  • Candidates, Bills, Laws & Protections

  • Wildlife & Oceania

  • Labeling & Transparency

  • Comprehensive Captivity & Hunting Results Databases


ree

ree

bottom of page